TERKINI
🌍 Global coverage 24/7 • 🏯 East Asia: China, Japan, Korea • 🛕 South Asia: India • 🏰 Europe • 🗽 Americas • 🌍 Africa • 🕌 Middle East • 🇵🇸 Palestine Solidarity • 📖 This Day in World History •
This article is an AI translation from the original language.
Sports

Socceroos Frustrated by Second USA Goal — Zwayer & VAR Come Under Fire

The Socceroos were deeply disappointed after losing 2–0 to the USA in Seattle, especially because the second goal was allowed despite Josh Sargent being in an offside position and blocking the view of the Australian goalkeeper. Coach Popovic acknowledged the frustration but praised the second-half improvement. Australia now depends on a win against Tunisia to advance.

20 Jun 20264 min read8 viewsBy Redaksi MeridianFIFA World Cup 2026
BeratDisemak silang 2 model · 62
Baca 30 saat
  • Socceroos kecewa dengan gol kedua USA yang dibenarkan walaupun dalam posisi ofsaid
  • Pemain dan jurulatih mengkritik keputusan pengadil dan VAR
  • Australia bergantung pada kemenangan atas Tunisia untuk mara
Socceroos Frustrated by Second USA Goal — Zwayer & VAR Come Under Fire

Image: Imej: Arne Müseler (BY-SA) via Openverse

The Heartbreaking Second Goal in Seattle

The FIFA 2026 World Cup match between Australia and the United States at Lumen Stadium in Seattle on June 20, 2026, was not just a loss — it left a bitter taste. A 2–0 scoreline for the home team did not reflect the true intensity or tension of the game. What really hurt: the USA's second goal in the 67th minute.

Weston McKennie shot powerfully. The ball hit the crossbar and bounced toward the goal. Australian goalkeeper Patrick Beach slipped. Timothy Weah headed it — but the clear replay showed: Josh Sargent was in an offside position, *right behind* Beach, blocking his view. German referee Felix Zwayer consulted with VAR — and confirmed the goal. Australian players protested to the edge of the field. Protests continued until the final whistle.

"Stinker" — Captain's Words, Not a Joke

Mathew Ryan didn't hold back. After the match, the Socceroos captain called the referee's decision a "stinker" — a crude English term meaning *poor, disgusting performance*. "We felt the referee gave a very poor performance. It was a real stinker. We cannot accept that decision because it affected our chances of advancing," he told reporters.

Harry Souttar also spoke strongly: "Sargent wasn't just near — he *blocked* Beach. That wasn't passive assistance. That was active interference. The goal should have been disallowed."

Tony Popovic remained calm, but he couldn't hide his disappointment. "We don't want to blame the referee entirely, but it's hard to accept a goal like that in a big game like the World Cup. However, I'm proud of the players' reaction in the second half. They showed great fighting spirit."

Second Half: A Late Spark

Australia trailed 1–0 at halftime. But after the break, they changed. Midfield power returned — Jackson Irvine and Riley McGree controlled space, forcing the USA to retreat. The best chance came in the 54th minute: McGree took a powerful, curling shot from outside the box — saved only by Zack Steffen.

Four minutes later, Mitchell Duke headed in a low cross — straight into Steffen's arms.

Popovic brought on Martin Boyle in the 62nd minute. His speed and sharpness energized the left flank. He broke free from two defenders, entered the penalty area — but his final shot was weak. "We controlled the game in the second half. If we had been luckier, the result might have been different. But that's football — you have to take your chances," Popovic explained.

Group D: Three Points, One Hope

This loss placed Australia third in Group D with three points — following a 1–1 draw against Belgium in their opening match. The USA now leads the group with six points. Belgium is second (four points, 2–0 win over Tunisia). Tunisia has already been mathematically eliminated — without any points.

Australia *must* beat Tunisia on June 24 in Detroit to ensure advancement to the Round of 16. No room for mistakes. No room for false hope.

"We still have a chance. Tunisia is a tough team, but we believe in our own ability. We will fight until the final whistle," Ryan emphasized.

Media: Two Worlds, One Controversy

Australian media was divided. *The Sydney Morning Herald* led criticism with the headline: "A Dark Day for Football Justice." On social media, hashtags #BoycottVAR and #ZwayerOut trended for hours.

American media focused more on the victory — but did not deny the confusion. ESPN analyst Taylor Twellman said directly: "I understand Australia's frustration. Even though VAR helped, decisions like this damage the beauty of the game. Active offside definitely exists."

Detroit Awaits — and Changes Are Being Planned

The Socceroos will train in Seattle until June 22, before heading to Detroit. Popovic confirmed some tactical changes — including the possibility of starting Joe Gauci as goalkeeper, rather than Patrick Beach, who was heavily criticized after the second goal incident.

"We need to bounce back. The players know their responsibilities. This loss is bitter, but it will make us stronger," concluded Popovic.

They still believe. But this time, their belief isn't enough. They need a goal. They need composure. And maybe — just maybe — a little bit of fairness that doesn't have to be decided by a VAR screen.